NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-To:
Date:
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:46:55 -0500
Reply-To:
Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Non-Commercial User Constituency <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines)
Anyone can use port 43; there is nothing in the protocol
that asks whether the packets come from the Disney
corporation, the FBI, Marc Schneiders or Al Qaeda.

>>> <[log in to unmask]> 03/16/04 05:55AM >>>
Milton: question -- why?  Why can't we restrict Port 43 and port 80 to 
limited technical uses pending development of a more comprehensive policy?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2