+1

This is what we feared.  No more ad hoc!!  Cut off the nose now.

Dan


--
Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author alone and do
not necessarily reflect any position of the author's employer.



At 11:53 AM +0900 2/14/13, Andrew A. Adams wrote:
>I seem to recall that our (NCUC, perhaps not NPOC) view on the Board's
>decision to grant IOC/ICRC protections without a PDP represented the nose of
>the camel in the tent and that this would likely lead to an attempt by the
>rest of the IGO community to believe that they could expect similar
>treatment). Our prediction is coming true, and this is the rest of the camel
>being pushed into the tent. I fully support strong efforts to push for a
>proper measured PDP approach to solving this issue and against these ad hoc
>special treatments for special interests.
>
>
>
>--
>Professor Andrew A Adams                      [log in to unmask]
>Professor at Graduate School of Business Administration,  and
>Deputy Director of the Centre for Business Information Ethics
>Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan       http://www.a-cubed.info/