Hi Michael,

Sounds good. Could you try to formulate that as a question
we could ask them? (Any others are of course also welcome to
give it a go.)

Tapani


On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:03:31AM -0400, Michael Karanicolas ([log in to unmask]) wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> How about one on Board transparency? We've heard calls for that as part of
> our subgroup discussions. In particular, we can ask their thoughts about a
> requirement that a decision to remove material from Board minutes must be
> grounded in one of the exceptions in the DIDP, and that material removed
> from minutes should, as far as possible, be scheduled for release after a
> particular period of time (to be determined based on the specific
> sensitivity of the material).
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Tapani Tarvainen <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> > Sounds like we'll only have one question for the board...
> >
> > Kathy, can you have publishable phrasing for it today?
> >
> > Anybody else, if you have other questions to suggest, please
> > let us know TODAY. Thanks.
> >
> > Tapani
> >
> >
> > On Mar 02 10:55, Kathy Kleiman ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
> >
> > > Tapani,
> > >
> > > These are questions for the Board/NCSG Meeting, right?   I think we
> > > should be asking questions about Compliance -- and continue our
> > > efforts to seek fairer compliance actions for registrants,
> > > compliance actions that fall within the scope of ICANN, and
> > > compliance actions responsive to the needs of the whole community
> > > (not a subset).
> > >
> > > This is definitely not the right phrasing yet, but we can certain
> > > provide it. I know Ayden and Raoul have been thinking about
> > > compliance. Would anyone else like to help craft a question for the
> > > board? (Please respond privately.)
> > >
> > > Best, Kathy
> > >
> > > On 3/2/2017 8:05 AM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> > > >Dear all,
> > > >
> > > >As time is running short, I'll take the liberty of hijacking
> > > >Farzaneh's message from NCUC list - thank you.
> > > >
> > > >So, questions below for all NCSG members. The deadline is rather
> > > >impossible, but I don't expect sky to fall if we extend it by
> > > >the weekend. Nonetheless quick comments would be appreciated.
> > > >
> > > >Tapani
> > > >
> > > >On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 07:57:57AM -0500, farzaneh badii (
> > [log in to unmask]) wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>NCUC members,
> > > >>
> > > >>Board has requested to answer the below questions for its meeting with
> > the
> > > >>stakeholder groups ( I think NCSG):
> > > >>
> > > >>1. To what degree is your membership actively participating in
> > > >>CCWG-Accountability Work Stream 2?  What could the Board or ICANN
> > > >>organization do to facilitate participation and timely completion of
> > this
> > > >>work?
> > > >>2. What policy/advice issues are top priorities for your group?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>They also want to know what we want to ask them during NCSG/Board
> > meeting.
> > > >>
> > > >>This meeting will take place at the NCSG level but I took the liberty
> > to
> > > >>ask you and trigger the discussion. If discussions take place on NCSG
> > about
> > > >>these questions and our questions to the Board, then we shall transfer
> > our
> > > >>input to that thread.
> > > >>
> > > >>Board has generously given us a deadline of 3 March for submitting our
> > > >>questions!
> > > >>
> > > >>Best
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>Farzaneh
> >

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen