NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G.
Date:
Mon, 8 Aug 2016 09:49:04 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (80 lines)
right
it is not part of the 800 or so sector members……

Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8837 7176
Skype: carlos.raulg
Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
On 8 Aug 2016, at 9:15, avri doria wrote:

> As far as I know ICANN is not a sector member of the ITU.
>
> avri
>
>
> On 08-Aug-16 09:44, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. wrote:
>> I see a few hundred of stakeholders in ITU (Sector members). Even
>> ISOC. But I don’t see ICANN
>>
>>
>> https://www.itu.int/online/mm/scripts/gensel11
>>
>>
>> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
>> +506 8837 7176
>> Skype: carlos.raulg
>> Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
>> On 8 Aug 2016, at 7:14, Sam Lanfranco wrote:
>>
>>> And ICANN is a "stakeholder without standing" in the ITU. As Internet
>>> governance comes of age it will transpire in many locations and at
>>> many levels.
>>> Just like stakeholders within ICANN, ICANN will have to figure out
>>> how to be everywhere almost all the time to deal with policy issues
>>> that impinge on its remit.
>>>
>>> Sam L.
>>>
>>> On 2016-08-07 8:47 PM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> But I guess GAC has less well-defined institutional dynamics than
>>>>> ITU.  Is that
>>>>> the difference you're getting at? -- I'm no expert on ITU either...)
>>>>>
>>>>> Or, are we now considering governments "stakeholders" too?  If so,
>>>>> why not
>>>>> just make GAC a garden-variety SG in GNSO?  The "GSG" -- Government
>>>>> Stakeholder Group?
>>>> Bingo. That's what is happening.
>>>>
>>>>> I may not be expert in the implications of the term of art
>>>>> "multilateral"
>>>>> but I honestly don't see much difference in ICANN being whip-tailed
>>>>> by GAC or
>>>>> ITU if the dynamic is comparable.  Can you elaborate on this
>>>>> distinction?
>>>> The difference is that an ICANN completely dominated by governments
>>>> is worse than the ITU because ICANN has global hierarchical power
>>>> over the DNS, whereas as a treaty-based organization the ITU cannot
>>>> make any sovereign member do something it doesn't want to do. When
>>>> ICANN imposes rules on how DNS works however, it has global effect.
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>>
>>> *--------------------------------------------*
>>> "It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
>>> in an unjust state" -Confucius
>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>> Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
>>> Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
>>> YorkU email: [log in to unmask]   Skype: slanfranco
>>> blog:  http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com
>>> Phone: 613 476-0429 cell: 416-816-2852
>>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus

ATOM RSS1 RSS2