NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Results of the Chartering process
From:
Rosemary Sinclair <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Rosemary Sinclair <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:49:10 +1000
Content-Type:
multipart/related
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1093 bytes) , text/html (6 kB) , image001.jpg (6 kB) , image002.jpg (6 kB) 
Yes – I’m clear now!



I think the solution is as Avri described sometime ago – the CC membership criteria



Cheers



Rosemary



Rosemary Sinclair

Director | External Relations

Australian School of Business | Level 3 Building L5 | UNSW | Sydney  NSW  2052

Direct:  +61 2 9385 6228 | Fax: +61 2 9385 5933

Email: [log in to unmask]<[log in to unmask]>  www.asb.unsw.edu.au<http://www.business.unsw.edu.au/>



[cid:image001.jpg@01CC374E.046052A0]    [cid:image002.jpg@01CC374E.046052A0]    EQUIS accredited for 5 years



From: Milton L Mueller [mailto:[log in to unmask]]

Sent: Wednesday, 29 June 2011 6:18 PM

To: Rosemary Sinclair; [log in to unmask]

Subject: RE: Results of the Chartering process









Milton - I'm not sure what the CSG/NCSG problem is....



[Milton L Mueller] The fact that half of the people involved in the CC are part of the CSG, and the other half part of the NCSG, and putting the CC in the NCSG can operate as yet another way to dilute the NCSG with commercial interests. Are you sure of what the problem is now?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2