NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Carl Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Carl Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:07:17 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2100 bytes) , text/html (7 kB)
Nicolas,

To bring you up to date of all the power and influence of the Microsoft, 
IBM and Intel consortium would be outside the resources and intent of 
this forum, I believe.  But I am sure there are many Internet references 
available at your finger tips.

with respect,
Lou

On 8/22/2012 4:12 PM, Nicolas Adam wrote:
> I'm pretty sure it refers to microsoft but -- and I don't usually 
> display an over-exuberance of love for ms --  I fail to see how it 
> [sic] has the major influence in the DNS system.
>
> Nicolas
>
> On 22/08/2012 4:04 PM, Kerry Brown wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure who or what you mean by "MS"?
>>
>> Kerry Brown
>>
>> *From:*NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf 
>> Of *Carl Smith
>> *Sent:* August-22-12 12:59 PM
>> *To:* [log in to unmask]
>> *Subject:* Re: [NCSG-Discuss] The DNS problem
>>
>> Thanks McTim,
>>
>> However, DNS is an IP look up system and re-director, where LISP is a 
>> programing language.  MS has the major influence in the DNS system.  
>> We need a less single source dominated system.  Our hope must come 
>> from the Open Source mavericks to provide the way.
>>
>> Lou
>>
>> On 8/21/2012 11:29 AM, McTim wrote:
>>
>>     On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Carl Smith
>>     <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>>     The DNS problem and reason for confusion is due to limitations
>>     imposed during the infancy of development stages of machine
>>     inter-connectivity. Basically, IP is insufficient to grant each
>>     machine a unique identity. The limited IP addresses are licensed
>>     to master networks which in turn are sub-netted to machines which
>>     only have a local identity slaved to the master.
>>
>>     Ultimately, we need a unique ID for each machine which is not
>>     slaved or controlled by a master.
>>
>>
>>
>>     Is this a DNS issue or an ID/Locator problem?
>>
>>
>>     If so, LISP may be what you want to look at here, not the DNS.
>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Cheers,
>>
>>     McTim
>>     "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is.
>>     A route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
>>
>



ATOM RSS1 RSS2