NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 23 Nov 2016 17:00:09 +0000
Reply-To:
Stephanie Perrin <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
Stephanie Perrin <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Totally agree with Amr.
Stephanie

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Bell network.
  Original Message
From: Amr Elsadr
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 7:31 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Reply To: Amr Elsadr
Subject: Re: Intercessional Planning


Hi,

> On Nov 23, 2016, at 1:49 PM, Group CEO-Vaibhav Aggarwal <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> In my opinion, it is the decision of the EC especially the Chair on this. I must point out that The tone and Tanner used (James) is not right.

I don’t agree, and see nothing wrong with the “tone and Tanner” used by James.

> The whole idea of the EC is to vest trust in them to taken decisions for the rest of the members.

I disagree again. All EC members are accountable to the NCSG members in both their decisions and processes used to make them. NCSG members have an obligation to raise questions and/or concerns when they have them.

> Appologies in advance if I am being direct.

Speaking for myself, no apologies needed. I appreciate directness. Spares me the trouble of having to second-guess what someone is saying. :)

Thanks.

Amr

ATOM RSS1 RSS2