LISTSERV - NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	NCSG-DISCUSS Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show HTML Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: A reminder on IANA Strwardship
From:	James Gannon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	James Gannon <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Thu, 26 May 2016 09:13:41 +0000
Content-Type:	multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (2161 bytes) , text/html (8 kB)

They have managed and performed the oversight function for many years. They are not part of the policy function which rests solely with us as the community, they have no role and no right to oversee any policy efforts developed through the bottom up MS process.



But that’s not NTIAs only role, most of the ‘travelling around the world on the taxpayers dime’ is related to their role as the US frontline in GAC, ITU and other broader policy objectives and not actually related to their IANA Stewardship function.



-J



From: NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on behalf of Ayden Férdeline <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>

Reply-To: Ayden Férdeline <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>

Date: Thursday 26 May 2016 at 10:06

To: "[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>

Subject: Re: A reminder on IANA Strwardship



Thanks for sharing this, James.



I'm a little surprised that Strickling would note on the record, even if true, that “we don’t provide any oversight of the policy judgments that ICANN and the multistakeholder community make”. If I was on the Senate Committee, I might wonder just what the NTIA had been doing and why they were traveling around the world on the taxpayers' dime if they have no sway?



That being said, Strickling did offer a brilliant and succinct explanation of why the transition not proceeding would harm Internet freedom. Good to be reminded of why the transition matters.



Ayden





On Thu, May 26, 2016 8:23 AM, William Drake [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> wrote:

A memorable performance



On May 26, 2016, at 09:05, James Gannon <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:



Just came across this again this morning, a poignant reminder of why we are all here and what we have been working for over the past 2 years. And why we shouldn’t stumble at the finish line.

In defence of the IANA Stewardship Transition…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIrs8n5Q7Yo



-James

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.SYR.EDU