NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Non-Commercial User Constituency <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:51:21 -0500
Reply-To:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Motion 2 on VI
From:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines) 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Non-Commercial User Constituency 
> 
> Though I expect I will push for a quick PDP in the charter 
> discussion, should this pass.

That's fine. The good thing about the compromise I proposed is that it pushes a lot of the contentious issues to the charter drafting discussion, where we need to achieve consensus not only among NCSG but also among the other SGs. Once the PDP is created, NCSG need not vote as a bloc and it will be especially interesting to see how the contracting party SGs align.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2