NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 9 Aug 2014 03:01:23 +0900
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
Hi,

attached the working draft of RySG position/statement and not yet official.
it will gives us an idea what are their concerns.

Rafik


2014-08-09 2:23 GMT+09:00 Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>:

>  Right. The point here is the unity among SG’s, not a complete and
> accurate description of our own (NCSG) concerns.
>
>
>
> *From:* NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of
> *Nicolas Adam
> *Sent:* Friday, August 08, 2014 1:28 PM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Fairly Urgent: Possible Joint Statement on
> Accountability
>
>
>
> To clarify my previous point: if that not yet aligned letter is what we
> can expect to get in time, than I am supporting that NCSG supports it.
>
>
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2