NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: [ncsg-policy] RE: Statement on Rec6
From:
Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:58:56 +0300
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (827 bytes) , text/html (1486 bytes) 
I support this statement's endorsement by the NCSG.

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> The ALAC statement is perfect as far as I am concerned - it could have been
> written by us.
> Do let's endorse it
> --MM
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Avri Doria [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 5:00 PM
> > To: NCSG-Policy; NCSG Members List
> > Subject: [ncsg-policy] Statement on Rec6
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The ALAC is putting out a statement on the Rec6 recommendations.
> >
> > I don't see us doing one by tomorrow.
> >
> > How about we endorse their statement?
> >
> > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/gTLD+WG+-
> > +ALAC+Draft+Statement+on+Rec+6+CWG+Report
> >
> > any objections?
> >
> > a.
>
>
>
> ----
> Everything about this list: http://info.n4c.eu/sympa/info/ncsg-policy
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2