NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Klaus Stoll <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Klaus Stoll <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 24 Jun 2016 02:23:59 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1022 bytes) , text/html (3694 bytes)




	

	

	

	



Friends

I can only agree with James! We should make this a real issue in the GNSO.

Yours

Klaus


On 6/24/2016 2:12 AM, James Gannon wrote:
> Hi All,
> As we know there are many changes coming for the role of the GNSO with 
> our new accountability powers, I want to call out the following item 
> on the council agenda for Helsinki
>
>   * Item 5: COUNCIL VOTE - Approval to Form a Drafting Team to Develop
>     an Implementation Plan for New and Additional GNSO Powers and
>     Obligations under the Revised ICANN Bylaws (15 minutes)
>
> I have to say that I am concerned about this, this is a critical item 
> for the GNSO and will set its strategic view and position for the next 
> 5-7 years most likely, I don’t fee very comfortable with this being 
> done in a potentially top down manner by council, I feel that this 
> should be developed in a bottom up manner by the SGs and C’s first.
>
> I would be interested in others thoughts so that we can guide the PC 
> on a position on this
>
>
> James



ATOM RSS1 RSS2