NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 1 Jun 2014 21:27:35 -0400
Reply-To:
Kathy Kleiman <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
Kathy Kleiman <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
I think we should talk with them about why the Trademark Clearinghouse 
is accepting "design marks" when it is only allowed to accept "word 
marks" as part of the Intellectual Property trademark registration 
process. I would also like to know why ICANN has spent time and money 
galore advertising the "rights protection mechanisms" of the New gTLDs 
but has not spent a second or a cent explaining what a URS action is, 
and how a Registrant can respond to a URS notice.

We spent a lot of time putting fairness and balance into the URS, but if 
no one teaches what it is or the broad defenses that exist, it is as if 
the balance we worked so hard for does not exist. Registrants around the 
world are left unprotected.

Best,
Kathy:
> Hi everyone,
>
> as usual we will have 1 hour meeting with the board and they need 
> topics we want to discuss in advance.
> can you please share what you think we should discuss with them. then 
> we will make a short topics list.
> please write a brief introduction of the topic.
>
> as starter I think we can have:
> 1/ IANA stewardship transition process
> 2/ ICANN accountability process
> Best Regards,
>
> Rafik
>


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2