To me, this only reaffirms Professor Mueller's statement about objecting to sensitivities. If every country objected (and won the argument) based on a sensitivity issue... Kind regards, Mark Leiser 145 Kilmarnock Road Suite 612 Glasgow G41 3JA Tel: +44 (0)845 299-7248 Email: [log in to unmask] Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/markleiser Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/mleiser Fax: +44 0141-404-2633 On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]>wrote: > What if Richard Branson of Virgin Airlines wanted .virgin? That would > actually make sense. > > http://www.virgin.com/company > > > On 8/14/2012 9:38 PM, Horacio T. Cadiz wrote: > >> We've been discussing new gTLDs and HR. Milton objected to the >> statement: "Consideration of applications for new TLDs should be >> mindful of sensitivities." >> >> KSA objects to .virgin, .baby, and others >> >> http://www.electronista.com/**articles/12/0/14/icann.** >> receives.registration.**complaints.on.moral.health.**grounds/<http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/0/14/icann.receives.registration.complaints.on.moral.health.grounds/> >> >> >> The sensitivities of the KSA have been aroused. >> >>
