I agree wholeheartedly :)



On 06/10/2015 12:20 PM, Tamir Israel wrote:
> Yes, but even in Canada, this tool is sometimes [mis]-used to force
> people to narrow their requests unnecessarily.
>
> I don't think it's unreasonable to go one step further and make ICANN
> shoulder a high degree of the cost here unless it becomes truly
> unreasonable, in which case tailoring the request or offering to let the
> requestor pay should be the remedy. They get all these revenues from
> DNS, may as well put them to good use.
>
> Best,
> Tamir
>
> On 10/6/2015 12:03 PM, Nicolas Adam wrote:
>> In Canada, when it is, you just have to pay the extra work load and/or
>> material to get it, and they offer you to refine your search instead
>> and work with you on your request. There is no way that a no is
>> acceptable.
>>
>> Big item for transparency and accountability IMO.
>>
>> Nicolas
>>
>>
>> On 06/10/2015 9:47 AM, Karel Douglas wrote:
>>> In some jurisdictions this can be a legitimate reason for denial if
>>> the request is too burdensome.
>