NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brenden Kuerbis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Brenden Kuerbis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:16:39 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2841 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)
+1

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We could produce a short support statement that says we support the points,
> but that we do not accept further delay of the program and suggest that
> issues re remedied within the next 60 days.
>
> or something similar.
>
> a.
>
> On 6 Dec 2010, at 16:41, Wendy Seltzer wrote:
>
> > I'm sure I have problems with some of the nits, including some of those
> > identified by ALAC.  I have more of a problem with continual delay, and
> > with the worse problems others would introduce if we "solve" these
> problems.
> >
> > --Wendy
> >
> > On 12/06/2010 04:34 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> >> I find myself in complete agreement with the ALAC statement on the
> crucial issues of the DRSP, the Independent Objector and the illegitimate
> role of the staff in setting policy. I cannot fathom why Wendy would want to
> approve the AG without modifications. Can you explain?
> >> --MM
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
> Of
> >>> Wendy Seltzer
> >>> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 1:36 PM
> >>> To: [log in to unmask]
> >>> Subject: Re: [NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: ALAC comment on the Proposed
> >>> Applicant Guidebook
> >>>
> >>> I would not endorse the conclusion of this statmeent.
> >>>
> >>> In particular, I personally disagree with the statement that "we must
> >>> regretfully but categorically state that we consider the current PAG to
> >>> be unacceptable as presented, and against the best interest of Internet
> >>> end-users."  I would urge the approval of the AG now.
> >>>
> >>> --Wendy
> >>>
> >>> On 12/06/2010 12:01 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Evan has asked the NCCG/NCUC to consider endorsing the ALAC statement.
> >>>>
> >>>> They expect to vote on it tomorrow, and Evan has indicated willingness
> >>> to come in and speak to us.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Draft+ALAC+Statement+on+Draf
> >>> t+Final+Applicant+Guidebook
> >>>>
> >>>> a.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Wendy Seltzer -- [log in to unmask] +1 914-374-0613
> >>> Fellow, Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy
> >>> Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
> >>> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
> >>> http://www.chillingeffects.org/
> >>> https://www.torproject.org/donate        <<        please donate!
> >>> http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Wendy Seltzer -- [log in to unmask] +1 914-374-0613
> > Fellow, Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy
> > Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
> > http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
> > http://www.chillingeffects.org/
> > https://www.torproject.org/donate        <<        please donate!
> > http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/
>
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2