NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Closed Generics - a letter together
From:
McTim <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
McTim <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:51:05 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (465 bytes) , text/html (1015 bytes) 
Hi Alex,

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Allowing closed generics will lead to massive traffic redirections



how so?


> worse than on .xxx circumstances compelling the concerned to take that
> string's allowable defensive registrations route.
>


If they are closed, how can they get a defensive registration?


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

ATOM RSS1 RSS2