NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Non-Commercial User Constituency <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Konstantinos Komaitis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:57:43 -0500
Reply-To:
Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: ICANN under scrutiny?
From:
Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Konstantinos Komaitis
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> http://www.nextgov.com/nextgov/ng_20090916_9990.php
>
> Republican lawmakers want answers from ICANN
> BY ANDREW NOYES, CONGRESSDAILY 09/16/2009

I don't think this is unexpected after the "deer in headlights"
performance of ex-CEO Paul Twomey during the hearings
couple of months ago.

What is really interesting as Milton stated recently on the
IGP blog, is the complete silence from ICANN's side and
the lack of public participation in what is being negotiated
and discussed in at least the last two board meetings.

http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2009/9/16/4323540.html

Regards
Jorge

ATOM RSS1 RSS2