NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Baudouin SCHOMBE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Baudouin SCHOMBE <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:49:15 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1224 bytes) , text/html (1924 bytes)
Effectivemment Avri, I think this option can not be excluded because
voluntary movements are very active in the community and, more generally,
with 80% of the rural and peri without significant economic power.
I support your warning on this point.

SCHOMBE BAUDOUIN
COORDONNATEUR DU CENTRE AFRICAIN D'ECHANGE CULTUREL (CAFEC)
COORDONNATEUR NATIONAL REPRONTIC
MEMBRE FACILITATEUR GAID AFRIQUE
NCUC/GNSO MEMBER (ICANN)

Téléphone mobile: +243998983491/+243999334571
                           +243811980914
email:                   [log in to unmask]
blog:                     http://akimambo.unblog.fr
siège temporaire : Boulevard du 30 juin Immeuble   Royal, Entrée A,7e
niveau.


2010/7/20 Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>

> Hi,
>
> Just checking.
>
> The contention by some on the VIWG has been that I am deluded when I argue
> that the NCSG, especially some of its institutional members have no interest
> in seeing Single Registrant TLD (.ngo for want of a better name) where the
> names could be distributed internally, without use of a registrar, to
> employees or members.
>
> Can anyone confirm my delusion?  Are their institutional members who think
> this sort of thing should exist - even if their name in not a famous brand?
>
> thanks
>
> a.
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2