NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 9 Jul 2014 17:23:13 -0400
Reply-To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (138 lines)
Hi,

The RSEP is the policy process by which exceptions in the policies
governing a Registry are made.  Using the RESP is part of the policy, so
that one size fits all policy can be altered to fit specific cases.

This RSEP request is currently in comment period.  After recommendations
will be made to the Board which has the ultimate authority to decide.

Process is defined in
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/policy-bd-2012-02-25-en

avri




On 09-Jul-14 17:03, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> Perhaps someone could care to educate me further on how things work in
> ICANN. If a request as the one contained in this announcement is
> received by ICANN, do they review such proposal based on the existing
> policies? and if they do, and determine that a proposal does not fit
> into existing policy/guidelines, is it right for ICANN staff to suggest
> updating existing processes to allow a proposal go through?
> 
> This is the way I understood this particular call and I hope someone can
> confirm that my understanding is incorrect.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> sent from Google nexus 4
> kindly excuse brevity and typos.
> 
> __
> ICANN <http://www.icann.org/>
> 
> 
>     News Alert
> 
> https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2014-07-08-en
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
>     Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names for .DEALS, XN--FJQ720A,
>     .CITY, .XYZ, .COLLEGE, .GOP, .TRADE, .WEBCAM, .BID, .HEALTHCARE,
>     .WORLD, .BAND
> 
> 8 July 2014
> 
>  
> 
> *Forum Announcement:* 	Comment Period Opens on 	*Date:* 	8 July 2014
> *Categories/Tags:* 	
> 
>       o Top-Level Domains
>       o Second-Level Domains
>       o Contracted Party Agreements
>       o Security/Stability
> 
> *Purpose (Brief):* 	
> 
> Six (6) Registry Services Evaluation Process (RSEP) requests were
> submitted by the registry operators listed below to allow the
> introduction of two-character domain names for the below TLDs. In total,
> the requests concern 12 New gTLDs.
> 
> Proposal 	TLD 	Registry Name 	Documents
> 2014027 	healthcare
> world
> band 	Binky Lake, LLC* 	Binky Lake, LLC Request 25 June 2014
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/binky-lake-healthcare-world-band-request-25jun14-en.pdf>
> [PDF, 16 KB]
> 2014024 	trade
> webcam
> bid 	Elite Registry Limited 	Elite Registry Limited Request 16 June 2014
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/elite-registry-trade-request-16jun14-en.pdf>
> [PDF, 16 KB]
> 2014023 	gop 	Republican State Leadership Committee, Inc. 	Republican
> State Leadership Committee, Inc. Request 12 June 2014
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/rslc-gop-request-12jun14-en.pdf>
> [PDF, 15 KB]
> 2014022 	xyz
> college 	XYZ.COM <http://XYZ.COM>, LLC 	XYZ.COM, LLC Request 12 June
> 2014
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/xyz-xyz-college-request-12jun14-en.pdf>
> [PDF, 18 KB]
> 2014016 	city 	Binky Lake, LLC* 	Binky Lake, LLC Request 6 June 2014
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/binky-lake-city-request-06jun14-en.pdf>
> [PDF, 16 KB]
> 2014015 	deals
> xn--fjq720a 	Binky Lake, LLC* 	Binky Lake, LLC Request 6 June 2014
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/binky-lake-deals-forsale-xn--fjq720a-request-06jun14-en.pdf>
> [PDF, 16 KB]
> 
> *Note: Binky Lake, LLC has submitted three RSEP requests on behalf of
> Donuts, Inc. for 6 gTLDs
> 
> As part of these requests, each registry operator described which
> two-character domain names for which it would offer these registrations.
> These RSEP requests were posted for public information on the Registry
> Service Evaluation Process webpage, available at
> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rsep-2014-02-19-en.
> 
> As required by the Registry Services Evaluation Policy
> <https://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/rsep.html>, ICANN has
> undertaken a preliminary determination on whether the proposals might
> raise significant competition, security or stability issues. ICANN's
> preliminary review (based on the information provided) did not identify
> any such issues for these requests.
> 
> Implementation of the proposal would require amendments to the Exhibit
> A, Approved Services of the respective Registry Agreements, which are
> being posted for public comment.
> 
> *Public Comment Box Link:*
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/two-char-new-gtld-2014-07-08-en
> <https://www.icann.org//public-comments/two-char-new-gtld-2014-07-08-en>
> 
> 
> 
> This message was sent to [log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]> from:
> 
> ICANN News Alert | [log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]> | ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite
> 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
> 
> 	
> 
> Email Marketing by iContact - Try It Free!
> <http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186>
> 
> Manage Your Subscription
> <http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=16602946&l=6333&s=B8V4&m=941459&c=165637>
> 
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2