Hi Amr,

thanks for the reminder, and looking for the draft.
we can setup a webinar for this topic to work next week on NCSG comment and
explain about the report. such confcall helped us for the NCSG answer to
IANA stewardship transition CWG.
details about the webinar will be sent later.

Best,

Rafik

2015-03-04 0:12 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]>:

> Hi again,
>
> Like I said on another thread, the public comment period for this initial
> report has been extended to March 17th. At this point, it’d be really good
> to start getting some feedback/input. I’d also be happy to answer any
> questions.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
> On Feb 25, 2015, at 3:35 PM, Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > One of the currently open public comment periods is for the GNSO
> Policy/Implementation Working Group initial report and recommendations. The
> public comment period closes on March 3rd. Details on that can be found
> here:
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/policy-implementation-2015-01-19-en
> >
> > Normally public comments are submitted via email after drafting,
> however, this working group members have developed a survey to help them
> get answers to specific questions. This does not preclude the option of
> sending in free text comments as part of the survey or separately.
> >
> > Several NCSG members participated in this working group, and I am
> personally largely in support of the recommendations it has made. It has
> come up with some very interesting principles it is asking the GNSO and
> ICANN board to adopt in relation to gTLD policy development and
> implementation. Additionally, it is proposing three new processes to be
> used under certain circumstances as well as formalising the role of
> implementation review teams; to keep the GNSO engaged with the Global
> Domains Division (GDD) of ICANN during policy implementation.
> >
> > I do have a few minor issues that I tried to make clear in a draft
> response to the survey that I’m drafting on behalf of the NCSG. I’ve
> attached that to this email, and would very much appreciate feedback before
> the policy committee has a go at it. If there are folks out there who are
> interested in GNSO processes, then please go through the working group’s
> initial report. It’s actually really good stuff. Be warned though that it
> isn’t exactly light reading. :)
> >
> > I’d be happy to answer any questions if anyone’s got ‘em.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Amr
> >
> > <NCSG response to PI WG initial report survey questions - Draft.pdf>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> [log in to unmask]
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>