NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
PeterGreen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PeterGreen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Jan 2016 21:16:21 +0800
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 kB) , text/html (21 kB)
There Kathy is. Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 08:11:32 -0500
From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Privacy and WHOIS update
To: [log in to unmask]


  
    
  
  
    Hi Poomjit,

    It is an individual signup process -- and you'll be asked for some
    information and the choice of whether to be a "member" or
    "observer."  

    Here's the link --
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1f7D_KBC8BPY0WtEFYq9igm1E-2L4xX_MS55yKiL8MZ0/viewform?c=0&w=1

    Good to have you aboard,

    Kathy

    

    On 1/14/2016 8:03 AM, Poomjit
      Sirawongprasert wrote:

    
    
      Hi Stephanie,
      Could you please add me into the observer list?
      Thanks, 
      Moui
      Sent via Mobile
      On Jan 10, 2016 4:38 AM, "Stephanie
        Perrin" <[log in to unmask]>
        wrote:

        
           This is just a quick
            note to update list members on what is going on at ICANN
            related to privacy and protection of registration data.  The
            most important development which I need to bring to your
            attention is the call for volunteers for the new pdp to
            develop a replacement for the WHOIS directory.  I have
            copied the call at the bottom of this email.  Please
            consider joining, either as an observer or full
            participant.  If you have questions, please do not hesitate
            to contact me, Tapani Tarvainen, or Kathy Kleiman (in cc). 
            We really need a great many people to volunteer for this
            work, as it is extremely important, and there are many
            commercial participants already signed up.  It is important
            to have balanced representation of interests on these
            working groups.

            

            Registrars and technical experts have expressed concern,
            notably at the GNSO level, about the RDAP (registration data
            access protocol) work that is proceeding even though the
            work of the PDP on WHOIS replacement may make this work
            irrelevant.  It is likely a call to put the brakes on that
            work may develop.  For more information on the RDAP
            implementation, look here:https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rdap-profile-2015-12-03-en. 

            We will be putting in comments, due in 22 days.

            

            The call for volunteers for the Competition and Consumer
            Trust Review Team has resulted in the selection of the team,
            listed here:  https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2015-12-23-en. 
            This is a very important review, and members may be
            interested in following the work of this team.  Further
            information is available here http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/cct
            and members may be interested in looking at the public
            opinion survey done by Nielsen in 2015, as it will no doubt
            be important for the work of the committee, and be
            considered in the context of the the two studies of DNS
            abuse for which ICANN is currently tendering.

            

            The Final report and recommendations of the Privacy Proxy
            Working Group has been sent to the GNSO for its endorsement,
            and will be discussed at the Marrakech meeting in March.  We
            expect to see a call for volunteers for the implementation
            working group shortly. 

            

            Finally, we are proposing to have a privacy meeting in
            Marrakech, although we have yet to hear whether this
            proposal has been approved.  Stay tuned, and please join us
            for the next monthly discussion on January 19th.

            

            Stephanie Perrin

            
                
              
                  https://www.icann.org/news/announcements

              
              
                Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy Development
                    Process (PDP) Working Group to Establish a Policy
                    Framework for a Next-Generation gTLD Registration
                    Directory Service to Replace WHOIS (Next-Gen RDS)
              
              
                How to Join
              
              If you are interested in joining the WG as an
                individual participant or mailing list observer, please
                fill in the sign
                  up form or send the Word document [DOCX, 72 KB] filled
                in to the GNSO
                  Secretariat

              
              All members and observers will be listed on the PDP
                WG's wiki page. 

              
              
                In Brief
                The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council
                seeks volunteers to serve on a PDP Working Group to
                establish a policy framework for a next-generation gTLD
                Registration Directory Service (RDS) to replace WHOIS
                (Next-Gen RDS). The GNSO Council approved
                  the WG's charter on 19 November 2015, tasking this
                PDP to address concerns with WHOIS by creating a new
                policy framework capable of balancing diverse interests
                to meet today's needs for gTLD registration data.

              
              

              
              What This Team Will Do
              

                The PDP WG will use a 3-phase process defined in the approved charterto (1) establish
                gTLD registration data requirements to determine if and
                why a next-generation RDS is needed, (2) design policies
                that detail functions that must be provided by a
                next-generation RDS to support those requirements, and
                (3) provide guidance for how a next-generation RDS
                should implement those policies, coexisting with and
                eventually replacing WHOIS. 

              
              This PDP WG will provide the GNSO Council with policy
                recommendations regarding the issues identified in the Final Issue Report [PDF, 1.4 MB]
                and as defined in the charter approved by the GNSO Council
                [PDF, 628 KB]. Specifically, this PDP WG is tasked with
                analyzing the purpose of collecting, maintaining and
                providing access to gTLD registration data and
                considering safeguards for protecting that data,
                determining if and why a next-generation RDS is needed
                to replace WHOIS, and creating policies and coexistence
                and implementation guidance to meet those needs.

              
              During the first phase of this PDP, the PDP WG will,
                at a minimum, attempt to reach consensus recommendations
                regarding the questions detailed in the PDP WG’s
                charter. The PDP WG’s output will then be submitted to
                the GNSO Council for approval of its recommendations
                regarding IF and WHY a next-generation RDS is needed to
                replace WHOIS before moving to the next phase. If the WG
                concludes a new policy framework is needed, this output
                should include requirements to be addressed by that new
                framework and any next-generation RDS. However, if the
                WG concludes the existing WHOIS system can adequately
                address requirements, the WG’s output should confirm
                this and identify any necessary changes to the WHOIS
                policy framework.

                

              
              After Phase 1, if the GNSO Council confirms that a new
                policy framework and next-generation RDS are required,
                the PDP WG will then proceed to Phases 2 and 3,
                recommending a new consensus policy framework to satisfy
                requirements for a next-generation RDS established in
                Phase 1, along with any necessary coexistence and
                implementation guidance. Further detail regarding this
                3-phase process and questions to be considered can be
                found in the PDP WG’s charter.

                

                How This Team Will Work
              

                ICANN WGs use transparent, open processes. The meetings
                of this PDP WG will be recorded, and the recordings will
                be available to the public. The mailing list for the PDP
                WG will be archived publicly. The group will collaborate
                using a public workspace for draft materials and all
                final work products and milestones will be documented on
                the WG's wiki. The PDP WG is expected
                to follow the GNSO Working Group Guidelines
                [PDF, 350 KB] as well as the GNSO PDP Manual.

                

                How to participate 
              

                There are two ways to volunteer: 
              Individual Members – anyone interested cann volunteer
                to join the PDP WG as a WG member, regardless of whether
                they are members of the ICANN community. Members are
                expected to actively contribute to mailing list
                conversations as well as meetings – it is anticipated
                tthat the PDP WG will at a minimum meet on a weekly
                basis via teleconference. Members are expected to
                provide essential input to the process. Members will be
                required to provide a Statement of Interest (SOI). 
              Mailing list observers – for those who are merely
                interested in monitoring thhe WG’s conversations,
                there is the possibility to sign up as a mailing list
                "observer" which offers read-only access to the mailing
                list. Mailing list observers will not be permitted to
                post, will not receive invitations to the various
                meetings or calls of the WG and will not have to
                complete a Statement of Interest. At any point in time,
                a mailing list observer can join the WG as a member
                simply by informing the GNSO Secretariat. 
              In addition, there will be opportunities to provide
                input through public consultations and public comment
                processes that the PDP WG is expected to organize.

                

                How to Join
              

                If you are interested in joining the WG as an individual
                participant or mailing list observer, please fill in the
                sign
                  up form or send the Word document [DOCX, 72 KB] filled
                in to the GNSO
                  Secretariat

              
              All members and observers will be listed on the PDP
                WG's wiki page. 

                

                Next steps
              

                In its motion, the GNSO Council directed that this call
                for volunteers be circulated as widely as possible in
                order to ensure broad representation and participation
                in the WG. This call will remain open until the WG
                convenes for the first time. At this juncture, it is
                anticipated that the PDP WG may convene online in late
                January 2015. Following that, regular online meetings
                will be scheduled in accordance with the PDP WG’s work
                plan, which it is expected to develop as one of its
                first tasks.

                

                Further information and preparation
              For those interested in volunteering for this effort,
                you are strongly encouraged to review the following
                materials prior to the first meeting of the PDP WG: 
              The Final Issue Report 
              The approved charter 
              Materials available at the PDP WG's wiki such as the EWG Final
                Report and other relevant information. 
              
                Background
                

                Created in the 1980s, WHOIS began as a service to
                identify and contact entities responsible for the
                operation of a network resource on the Internet. Over
                the years, ICANN's requirements for gTLD domain name
                registration data collection, access and accuracy have
                undergone some important changes. Yet, after nearly 15
                years of task forces, review teams, and studies,
                comprehensive WHOIS policy reform remains the source of
                long-running discussion and debate.

              
              In 2012, the ICANN Board launched the Expert Working
                Group on gTLD Registration Directory Services (EWG) to
                help redefine the purpose of gTLD registration data and
                consider how to safeguard the data, and to propose a
                model for gTLD registration directory services (RDS) to
                address accuracy, privacy, and access issues.

              
              Upon publication of the EWG's Final Report in June,
                2014, an informal group of GNSO Councilors and ICANN
                Board Members collaborated to propose a Process
                Framework for structuring a GNSO PDP to successfully
                address these challenging issues. This Process Framework
                was adopted by the Board in 2015, along with a
                reaffirmation of its 2012 request for a PDP to be
                convened to define the purpose of collecting,
                maintaining and providing access to gTLD registration
                data. The Board also asked that the PDP consider
                safeguards for protecting data, using the
                recommendations in the EWG's Final Report as an input
                to, and, if appropriate, as the foundation for a new
                gTLD policy.

              
              In preparation for this PDP, a new Preliminary Issue Report [PDF, 1.4
                MB] was published for public comment on 13 July 2015. A
                Final Issue Report [PDF, 1.2 MB]
                was subsequently published on 7 October 2015, including
                links to all public comments received, along with a
                draft charter for the PDP WG. This draft charter was
                approved by the GNSO Council on 19 November 2015, enabling the
                formation of a GNSO working group of community
                volunteers to progress this PDP.

              
              More information can be found on the GNSO PDP on Next-Generation gTLD
                  Registration Directory Service (RDS) page and the
                WG's wiki, including the WG's
                charter, inputs already provided by all SG/Cs during the
                public comment period, and an extensive library of
                foundational materials to inform the WG's deliberations.
                In addition, the WG will reach out to all SG/Cs for
                feedback on any items that they believe should be
                considered that may not have been specifically called
                out in the approved charter.

              
              As this will be a complex multi-phase PDP, all those
                interested in helping to shape the policy framework for
                a next-generation gTLD RDS are encouraged to volunteer
                for this WG. Only with the help of the entire community
                can this WG achieve its goal of formally defining an
                appropriate purpose of gTLD registration data and
                establishing a new policy framework to enable
                permissible access to that data with improved privacy
                and accuracy.

                

                

              
              
                

                
                

              
            
            

          
        
      
    
    
 		 	   		  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2