NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:05:43 +0300
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (995 bytes) , text/html (2168 bytes)
Thanks Milton. Yes it can be fixed through Bylaws changes to Board
appointment and institutional structural reforms. But only if the BOD
resolved as such. The alternative would to let them be and Africa's Human
Rights civil society organisations distance themselves from AFRICANN/NIC
moves.


On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>  Well said, Alex. Can this be fixed? ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of
> *Alex Gakuru
>
> Mailing lists can/are open but effective policy influence is achieved with
> representation on the policy making table. Their 6-person BOD structure
> http://www.afrinic.net/en/our-structure/bod  of Eastern Africa(1), Indian
> Ocean(1), Northern Africa(1), Western Africa(1), Central Africa(1),
> Southern Africa(1) are business, ccTLDs and government persons. It does not
> provide for civil society representatives. Or would I be missing one
> (including on the listed past) BOD members?
>
>  ****
>
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2