NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Seun Ojedeji <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Seun Ojedeji <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 Jul 2014 18:56:50 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (846 bytes) , text/html (1057 bytes)
sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 8 Jul 2014 17:49, "Sam Lanfranco" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>.
>
> There are two big problems here. The first it what should be subject to
judicial authorization. The second is what criteria (or credentials) are
used to determine who has the proper capacity to act. In a criminal case if
the courts give permission to search a premises they don't give that
permission to the postal deliver person, or the lawn care company, it goes
to the police.
>
>  There are two problems here.
>
The scenario you've raised are indeed practical just that in real life
situation, it's only the few who fall victim. Unfortunately such act in the
Internet world affects a long tree of users which makes it a bigger
concern. Overall, some level of technical literacy is required even in the
judicial system.

Cheers!
> Sam L.
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2