Hi ,

Thanks Avri and Amr, we need to settle out this and appoint NCSG
representative in the cross-community working group. for procedure matter,
shall we sent the name to GNSO council? for representation, I would like to
ask the NCSG policy committee to proceed and respond quickly to this. I do
think that Avri would make a good representative and liaison there.

indeed, everyone is encouraged to join as observer (being observer doesn't
mean having a lower status regarding participation). I am joining myself
the CCWG.

Best Regards,

Rafik


2014-09-08 18:42 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]>:

> Hi,
>
> Sounds good to me. And like Avri, I believe it’d be good to have as many
> NCSG members sign up for the CWG as possible.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
> On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:37 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The charter was approved.
> >
> > I request that I be designated to continue the role I held in the
> > Drafting team for this charter, as the NCSG rep on this group.
> >
> > I also encourage others to participate in this group.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > avri
> >
> >
> >
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Update from the GNSO and draft call for
> > observers for your review
> > Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 19:35:52 +0000
> > From: Marika Konings <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > For your information, the GNSO Council adopted the CWG charter during its
> > meeting today (see resolution below). The GNSO has requested that GNSO
> > Stakeholder Groups provide the names of members for the CWG by 15
> September
> > at the latest and has recommended that the chairs of the DT serve as the
> > interim chairs of the CWG until the CWG has had the opportunity to select
> > its leadership.
> >
> > In order to prepare for the call for observers, we've prepared the
> attached
> > draft call that we would suggest is posted and circulated once most of
> the
> > chartering organisations have appointed their members (we understand that
> > the SSAC has already adopted the charter and the ALAC vote is finishing
> > tomorrow). If you have any comments or suggestions, please feel free to
> > share.
> >
> > As your respective organisations identify their members for the CWG,
> please
> > provide the information to Grace so that they can be added to the mailing
> > list. We hope it will be possible to schedule a first meeting of the CWG
> in
> > early October so the group can discuss whether or not it would like to
> meet
> > in Los Angeles, and if so, what the agenda should be and what materials
> > should be prepared, if any.
> >
> > As you'll have noted from the announcement that Grace just shared, the
> ICG
> > has requested that all formal responses are expected to be submitted by
> 31
> > December 2014.
> >
> > We hope this is helpful.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Marika
> >
> > ====================
> >
> > Adoption of a Charter for a Cross Community Working Group to Develop an
> IANA
> > Stewardship Transition Proposal on Naming Related Functions
> >
> > Made by: Avri Doria
> > Seconded by: Amr Elsadr
> >
> > Whereas,
> > 1. The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA)
> has
> > requested that ICANN ³convene a multistakeholder process to develop a
> plan
> > to transition the U.S. government stewardship role² with regard to the
> IANA
> > Functions and related root zone management.
> > 2.
> > 3.
> > 4. On June 6 2014, ICANN proposed the creation of an IANA Stewardship
> > Transition Coordination Group (ICG) ³responsible for preparing a
> transition
> > proposal reflecting the differing needs of the various affected parties
> of
> > the IANA functions.²
> > 5.
> > 6.
> > 7. It was determined that the transition proposal should be developed
> within
> > the directly affected communities (i.e. the IETF for development of
> > standards for Internet Protocol Parameters; the NRO, the ASO, and the
> RIRs
> > for functions related the management and distribution of numbering
> > resources; and the GNSO and ccNSO for functions related to the Domain
> Name
> > System). These efforts would inform the work of the ICG, whose
> > responsibility would be to fashion an overall integrated transition
> proposal
> > from these autonomously developed components.
> > 8.
> > 9.
> > 10. Following distribution of an invitation to participate, a drafting
> team
> > (DT) was formed with participants from the ccNSO, GNSO, SSAC and ALAC to
> > develop a charter for a Cross Community Working Group to Develop an IANA
> > Stewardship Transition Proposal on Naming Related Functions.
> > 11.
> > 12.
> > 13. The DT delivered the proposed charter for consideration to the ccNSO,
> > GNSO, SSACC and ALAC (see [include link to proposed charter]).
> > Resolved,
> > 1. The GNSO Council approves the Charter [include link] and appoints
> > Jonathan Robinson as the GNSO Council liaison and member to the CWG.
> > 2.
> > 3.
> > 4. Each GNSO Stakeholder Group will identify one member for the CWG by 15
> > September taking into account the charter requirement that best efforts
> > should be made to ensure that members:
> > * Have sufficient expertise to participate in the applicable subject
> matter;
> > * Commit to actively participate in the activities of the CWG on an
> ongoing
> > and long-term basis; and
> > * Where appropriate, solicit and communicate the views and concerns of
> > individuals in the organization that appoints them.
> > *
> > * 3. The GNSO will collaborate with the other SOs and ACs to issue a call
> > for observers to join the CWG, each in accordance with its own rules.
> > *
> > * 4. Until the CWG selects its co-chairs for the CWG, the GNSO Council
> > recommends that the co-chairs of the Drafting Team shall serve as the
> > interim co-chairs of the CWG.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > <Call for Observers - 4 September 2014.docx><Attached Message Part.txt>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> [log in to unmask]
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>