NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:41:12 +0300
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (883 bytes) , text/html (7 kB)
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> More info but still no link to Court order ...
>
>
> http://rulingclass.wordpress.com/2010/11/28/the-background-dope-on-dhs-recent-seizure-of-domains/
>
> Regards
> Jorge
>

Lucky eBay!! - theirs is accorded all due process. This a demonstration of
future of legal double standards and/or transparent due process?
- - - -
*Title: **Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay*

*Docket: *10-300<http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-300.htm>
*Issue(s): *Whether, under the doctrine of contributory trademark
infringement, a defendant can be held liable for operating a marketplace
that it knows is used to sell substantial quantities of goods that infringe
a plaintiff's trademark, even if it does not know that particular goods are
infringing.

http://www.scotusblog.com/2010/11/petitions-to-watch-conference-of-11-23-10/


ATOM RSS1 RSS2