NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:29:09 +0900
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1083 bytes) , text/html (1565 bytes)
I support Mary and Bill nomination :)

Rafik

PS @Bill I guess that you are supporting youth inclusion
and involvement nope ;)?


2010/10/13 Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>

> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > Could we start with a very quick yes/no from William and Mary as to
> > whether they propose to re-nominate?
> >
>
> "The phrase William and Mary usually refers to the coregency  over the
> Kingdoms of England, Scotland and Ireland, of King William III and Queen
> Mary II. Their joint reign began in February 1689, when they were called to
> the throne by Parliament, replacing James II & VII, Mary's father and
> William's uncle/father-in-law, who was "deemed to have fled" the country in
> the Glorious Revolution of 1688. After Mary died in 1694, William ruled
> alone until his death in 1702. Their rule was the only period in British
> history in which "joint sovereigns" with equal powers were allowed to reign"
>
> (from Wikipedia)
>
> Just a little history for fun... would either of them like being called
> "King William" and "Queen Mary"? :-)
> Mary has to promise not to die, however.
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2