Avri has raised the question of whether or not NCSG should be concerned
with the names and resolving protocols questions raised in the following
IETF document:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem-00.txt
Having read the document here is my small contribution. There may be
some issues in the questions raised that might become of interest to
NCSG but given the nature of the issue – reserve names linked to other
(non-DNS) resolution protocols- my advice is to leave it up to the IETF
to ruminate over the issues and, at the appropriate times, that may toss
up issues for NCSG to consider. It does not look like an area where NCSG
mining documents for NCSG-centric issues would be productive.
Sam L. (NPOC)
/
//
/
/On 2015-11-04 4:50 PM, Avri Doria wrote://
/
> /https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem-00.txt//i
> know the council is not interested in such things, but thought maybe
> the NCSG is. avri/