Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 23 Mar 2014 15:21:54 -0400 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thank you.
I've reviewed and look forward to the next steps.
Heather
Heather Leson
[log in to unmask]
Twitter: HeatherLeson
Blog: textontechs.com
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Nicolas Adam <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
> I am with McTim on this one.
>
> Nicolas
>
>
> On 2014-03-23 1:47 PM, McTim wrote:
>
>> It is a perfectly reasonable statement IMO.
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> just to clarify about this statement as NCSG comment on IANA transition:
>>> - we had the PC meeting today and discussed about the statement as was
>>> requested. we made some changes suggested during the meeting.
>>> - this version was circulated by Milton to the NCSG list with 24 hours
>>> for
>>> comments.
>>> - after that I will send it on behalf of NCSG to the concerned parties.
>>> hope that is much more clear.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-03-23 17:51 GMT+09:00 Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>:
>>>
>>>> Visible here:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sJ0Fo_
>>>> 4LalYbyRuq4B3X5uf7TySIDq9Mrb3UVByoXIg/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
|
|
|