NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:42:58 -0400
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Questions about new TLDs
From:
Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Non-Commercial User Constituency <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
Haven't read the proposal yet, but I don't agree at all with your
conclusion Adam. We need uniform process and shouldn't discriminate
against IDNs or apply "special" (read: more restrictive) criteria to
them. But perhaps you can explain why you think this should be the case.


Dr. Milton Mueller
Syracuse University School of Information Studies
http://www.digital-convergence.org
http://www.internetgovernance.org

>>> Adam Peake <[log in to unmask]> 06/24/05 8:27 AM >>>
Think the process as suggested is very flawed.  IDNs should not be
considered in the same process as traditional ascii TLDs.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2