NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-NCUC <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:42:37 -0200
Reply-To:
"Carlos A. Afonso" <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
"Carlos A. Afonso" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
But let us also take into account that the original system had 
significant improvementes, especially AnyCast (mirroring of root 
servers), and the recent efforts to deploy DNSSec. The central issue 
today is of political control: alterations in the root zone file are 
still subject to USG's exclusive "visto bueno".

--c.a.

On 12/01/2010 03:51 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
> I agree. In fact the current DNS system was developed at a time when
> things were simpler than they are now. I'm wondering if a superior
> system could be developed that actually works better and would attract
> adoption. I'm of the mindset that impossible=challenge and just because
> some have tried and failed doesn't mean to stop trying.
>
> On 12/1/2010 9:33 AM, Nuno Garcia wrote:
>> I was particularly fond of the expressions "loose nuts" and "another
>> troll".
>>
>> Of course I don't take it personally Jorge, but you should know to
>> choose your words better.
>>
>> The "it has been attempted before", or the "it's never going to work"
>> attitude is poison to innovation, creativite and moreover, it is
>> poison to participation.
>>
>> So please, I ask you to refrain from such attitutes. Their bad for our
>> collective health.
>>
>> Please note that I', not questioning how valid your arguments may be
>> (I'm pretty sure you feel you ought to say something out of your vaste
>> experience).
>>
>> Poor choice of words, poor attitude, maybe you're having a bad day? No
>> sweat, it happens to all of us.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Nuno Garcia
>>
>>
>> On 1 December 2010 17:05, Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>> Besides few loose nuts out there that have been trying to do the same
>> thing for two decades, there is no real incentive (meaning money) for
>> a $7B+ industry to change its ecosystem and pay attention to another
>> troll.
>>
>> The technology to have/use an alternate dns root exists and is
>> available to anybody, you just need to convince couple of hundred
>> million users and service providers to point to your own servers, and
>> then we can make a movie about the fights that will surface when
>> people try to determine who runs the servers and how and who/how you
>> pay to keep it running.
>>
>> Again, what we need is something better and more elaborated that an
>> alternate root, a new scheme that enables applications to locate
>> resources using a protocol and name space that is not tied to the
>> current DNS.
>>
>> My .02
>> Jorge
>>
>>
>

-- 

Carlos A. Afonso
====================================
new/nuevo/novo e-mail: [log in to unmask]
====================================

ATOM RSS1 RSS2