NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:58:35 +0300
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From:
Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:50:12AM +0200, Tatiana Tropina ([log in to unmask]) wrote:

> I agree with James,
> For example (I am just talking theoretically) one can't vote for 2 of three
> candidates + NOTA, because NOTA would mean that no candidate is selected.

You can vote just two of the candidates just fine.

The system does not force you to choose three candidates: just choose
two and leave the third as well as NotA unselected.

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen

ATOM RSS1 RSS2