NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Klaus Stoll <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Klaus Stoll <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 1 Dec 2016 09:00:29 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2089 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)
Dear All

I wish we would spend as much time and energy on IG policy making topics 
as we spend time on the merits of various places around the world to 
host an ICANN Intersessional meeting. Can we talk about what we need to 
discuss t the meeting, the goals we want to achieve and how to get 
there. When we do this, the place might not be of such an importance.

Yours

Klaus

PS: Kuawi, Hawaii. Definitely!



On 12/1/2016 1:37 AM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
> Sam,
>
> I don't think it was clear at all that some locations were said 
> "almost in jest". What was made clear, however, on page 14 
> <https://community.icann.org/display/ncph/Planning+-+Intersessional+2017%3A+Call+details%2C+recordings%2C+transcripts?preview=/63144502/63150133/transcript_ncphpc_291116.pdf> 
> of the transcript, was the instruction to, "Please type [locations] 
> into the chat. No tongue in cheek suggestions, please, because we 
> can’t see or hear your tone when you're typing that in." If that 
> instruction was ignored and our representatives on the call did 
> instead suggest cities not well suited to hosting a meeting such as 
> this one, I'm not sure who they thought they were serving.
>
> Ayden Férdeline
> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>
>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: NCPH Intersessional timing
>> Local Time: 1 December 2016 12:24 AM
>> UTC Time: 1 December 2016 00:24
>> From: [log in to unmask]
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>
>> In response to who made the suggestions for a location for the CGPH
>> Intersession, a review of the session Chat transcript
>> makes it clear that the names were tossed out at the last minute, and
>> some serious and some almost in jest.
>>
>> One gets a sense from the overall records of the meeting, that Reykjavik
>> remains a front runner.
>> The decision is supposed to be out on Friday, Dec 2nd.
>>
>> https://community.icann.org/display/ncph/Planning+-+Intersessional+2017%3A+Call+details%2C+recordings%2C+transcripts?preview=/63144502/63150134/acchat_ncphpc_291116_.pdf
>>
>> Sam L.
>



ATOM RSS1 RSS2