NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Hakikur Rahman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Hakikur Rahman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:20:30 +0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
In favor we support any sort of assistance "for workshops and technical
forums in
developing countries", and this would enhance local level coordinations,
though during the previous years it has increased a lot. People among the
communities are aware of the international events, even they can not
participate.

Thanks for sharing the information with the group.

Best Regards.
Hakik.

At 03:07 AM 1/26/05, Milton Mueller wrote:
>Some time in the next week we will teleconference with ICANN staff
>about the strategic plan. I am formulating a response. One issue strikes
>me as open to debate. ICANN proposes to create a "Restricted Fund for
>Developing Country Internet Communities."
>
>Do we favor or oppose?
>
>In favor: ICANN provides support for workshops and technical forums in
>developing countries. The governance model of ICANN has been critizied
>by many on grounds that it does not foster participation from developing
>countries. This can be viewed as an appropriate response.
>
>Oppose: this steps outside of ICANN's coordination role and makes it
>into a much more expansive welfare state type of agency. Those who are
>supported by ICANN are also, to a large degree, under the control of
>ICANN; it might be better for independent agencies (foundations, higher
>education institutions, civil society organizations, governments) to
>provide this kind of support.
>
>Please give me your opinion.


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.5 - Release Date: 1/26/05

ATOM RSS1 RSS2