NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:
Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:41:46 +0100
Reply-To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Hi,

I think this is a great idea, and something that would best be done by someone who was not partisan on the issue.

Where you offering?

avri

On 26 Feb 2013, at 12:20, Clarinettet wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> May I submit one easy suggestion. Obviously, as every option, there are pros and cons. To adopt a common position, we need to balance the pros and cons. I suggest a worksheet to be created with two columns representing each side's views and vote from there. That way, everyone can validity judge and discuss. It's not very easy to follow discussions on series of emails.
> 
> Do you agree?
> 
> Tara Taubman

ATOM RSS1 RSS2