NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Non-Commercial User Constituency <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Date:
Sat, 8 May 2010 18:09:32 -0400
Reply-To:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
> -----Original Message-----
> It was never Int Gps OR Constituencies for me
> 
> It was Int Gps AND Constituencies - to leave all options open to members
> to organise in whatever way best meet their needs
> 

Rosemary:
It is, in fact, either-or. For better or worse you do have to make the choice.
Constituencies are inherently silo-like structures which are afforded mutually exclusive forms of representation and guaranteed seats. If you have constituencies, you fragment the NCSG into competing groups; you can't have an integrated voting structure for NCSG and you can't have interest groups. 

That's just the way it is. 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2