NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Date:
Sat, 14 Jul 2012 18:14:28 +0900
Reply-To:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Two cheers for regular and predictable idiotic nightmares.  


On Jul 14, 2012, at 2:19 AM, Avri Doria wrote:

> +1
> 
> On 13 Jul 2012, at 11:14, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> 
>> No way. There is no reason there can’t be another round a year after this one. Whether it’s one year or two yeras, the whole process should be regular and predictable, not a repeat of the idiotic nightmare we just went through.
> 
> In fact one of the primary principles which the GNSO mandated was that the process be regular and predictable.
> 
> 
>> 
>>> It's probably another decade at least before round 2 unfolds.
>> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2