NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: NOT for GNSO --> Fwd: EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010
From:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:27:07 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (784 bytes) , text/html (6 kB) 
I view this as a tempest in a teapot, and think we should avoid getting dragged into CSG-led issues like this when the root cause is just their own internal squabbling.
(dontcha just love having multiple constituencies?)

From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of William Drake


I agree with Avri and just wrote to Council saying Chuck's proposal doesn't work.  CSG is also quite unhappy with it.  I don't see how it can stand if at least half the Council's saying no.

This wouldn't be happening in the first place if our housemates were able to sort out their endorsements in less than 21 days (from currently just six GNSO candidates for the WHOIS group and five for SSR...)  Chuck was trying to recalibrate the GNSO's time line to accommodate theirs.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2