NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 13:20:17 -0400
Reply-To:
Nicolas Adam <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Motion on RAA
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
From:
Nicolas Adam <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
So that means rewriting points
I-[LEA proposed] amendments to RAA
1,
2 (?),
9,
10 (3),

Thx for your lead on this Milton.

Nicolas


On 31/10/2011 8:24 AM, Wendy Seltzer wrote:
> Most of these, we could accept, but not the ones cracking down on
> privacy and proxy services, requiring full verification of registrant
> WHOIS data, and holding registrars liable for abuse.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2