Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:06:24 +0700 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
+1
Norbert
On 9/27/2012 8:14 PM, Brenden Kuerbis wrote:
> I support this statement, thanks Avri.
>
> ---------------------------------------
> Brenden Kuerbis
> Internet Governance Project
> http://internetgovernance.org
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> The IOC/IFRC is claiming consensus on its proposal to suggest a
> temporary registration block for the IOC and IFRC. This is the
> statement I propose be added to the statement indicating the
> disagreement of the NCSG with that proposal.
>
> I request that the NCSG-PC endorse this statement.
>
> -----
>
> The NCSG rejects the 3b "temporary registration block." defined in
> IOC/IFRC Drafting Team' recommendation for a number of reasons:
>
> 1. Policy recommendations from the GNSO on reserved names can only
> be made by a PDP that is properly constituted and is run according
> to the process rules as established in the ICANN by-laws.
>
> 2. This drafting team continues to circumvent proper process by
> attempting to make policy as opposed to performing its proper
> function of fact gathering and presenting information to the
> council that can be used in deciding on the viability and charter
> for such a PDP.
>
> The NCSG supports the PDP only on the condition that among the
> possible outcomes is the current status quo, no protection at the
> second level. We support the PDP as the only appropriate place to
> resolve this proposal among competing proposals. We believe it is
> illegitimate to change reserved name policy,,,,, no matter how it
> is euphemistically named, before the PDP runs its course.
>
> The NCSG is also aware of other types of humanitarian organization
> that also demand these privileges and we feel that any discussion
> on granting such special reservations must include a full
> discussion of all who request such reservations.
>
> Finally the NCSG does not believe that the reserved name list can
> be used solely for the purpose of new gTLDs, and that any
> decisions on adding names to the reserved list must take incumbent
> registries into account.
>
>
> ------
> Avri Doria
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncu-exec mailing list
> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ncu-exec
>
>
|
|
|