Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 28 Mar 2015 12:00:27 -0400 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
+1 to Milton. I remember the old days when there was no way in a domain
name to criticize a trademark owner without losing your domain name.
Newspapers could criticize and critique large companies for practices
they did not like even in headlines (such as abuse of migrant workers);
Saturday Night Live (a popular US TV show) could parody; but not in
domain names.
For years we posited a ".SUCKS" domain name where you could register a
trademark and make it very clear that the domain name was going to be
used for legal expression - to criticize, critique and parody. I
remember talking about how much I wanted it years ago - long before the
New gTLD program. How it would make life clearer online and provide
clear protections for speakers.
$2500 is a lot of money, but not out of line with what is being asked by
other New gTLD Registries. I heard that one new registry is demanding
the absurd price of $30,000 for its "landrush" domain names -- and
that's truly extortion. But $2500 while high is ballpark - that chance
to pull your (your company's) trademark out of .SUCKS and not be part of
the free speech and discussion to come.
Best,
Kathy
:
>
> I’m on .sucks side on this one.
>
> In effect, the .sucks domain seems to be engaged in a legitimate form
> of price discrimination between brand owners who want to suppress
> critical expression about their brands and people who actually want to
> use the domain for its intended purpose.
>
> Extortion means that one is threatened with violence or some other
> form of illegal harm if one doesn’t pay up. The idea that paying a
> high fee to preempt the mere possibility that someone might register
> and use a critical domain such as brand.sucks is not extortion.
>
> --MM
>
> *From:*NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf
> Of *Rafik Dammak
> *Sent:* Friday, March 27, 2015 6:09 PM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* [NCSG-Discuss] [Info] IPC Letter to ICANN regarding .SUCKS
>
> +1
>
> Hi everyone
>
> Please find attached the letter sent by IPC to ICANN about .sucks .
>
> Best Regards.
>
> Rafik
>
|
|
|