-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sure Robin, I think that is a good idea.
Joy

On 21/12/2012 11:31 a.m., Robin Gross wrote:
> Perhaps NCSG should make an official public statement to express
> our concern regarding the mis-handling of this issue by the GNSO
> Council (and possibly staff due to their shepherding of the motion
> through regardless of proper process)?  I think we need to draw
> attention to these problems where councilors are creating such
> privileges for their own clients with their council votes and also
> resubmitting a rejected motion without dealing with the conflict of
> interest causing the problem in the first place.
> 
> Thanks, Robin
> 
> On Dec 20, 2012, at 2:13 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
> 
>> On 20 Dec 2012, at 14:22, joy wrote:
>> 
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>>> 
>>> Thanks all for the comments. The matter was referred to the SCI
>>> today, following the Council meeting. Joy
>> 
>> 
>> It may have been referred to the SCI, but that is a case too
>> late.
>> 
>> the motion that both staff and the chair wanted passed was rammed
>> through. in my opinion this was illegitimate. and should have
>> waited on the recommendation of the SCI.
>> 
>> avri
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> IP JUSTICE Robin Gross, Executive Director 1192 Haight Street, San
> Francisco, CA  94117  USA p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451 
> w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: [log in to unmask] 
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ05VeAAoJEA9zUGgfM+bqV8EIALwLC4j0lUyBi3mOA8CDM2hC
dCrmFoTDUN1nIM74zCJdY5+/0WE/9zf1iR2T9JYjWV4/0QwHmnrDauRDaRDsonnU
jTzEvH5pGZVeJAJFMTVtYYUgaI9BMJb7EFFZsuJ/XerUAchTqds3BSa3cGscNXCQ
Yv1MDxLwQUd7FOoc/077KMQbyo+cGdt2q6AeiF1p/mxxcjEr/xwNJchzBsrFdyVg
Rso6G4cTvFkJBMY9kkEiq9vi9X3xWPQcN6nh03MeHLIw7kH1PJKFeM7+9bwElP1z
TDLR/b681/zqq+alpeL1rq65SZenNaBa+2cj/UliZjIoyfXHG0rR3ZaRmi5mD+Q=
=sco1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----