NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:
Wed, 4 Aug 2010 12:52:01 -0400
Reply-To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
NCSG-NCUC <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Hi,

No.

But it could be tracked as a electronic communication transactional record and if this list ever advocated 'mutiny' or some other dastardly deed, you could be linked to it.

a.

On 4 Aug 2010, at 12:41, Jorge Amodio wrote:

>>> The F.B.I. contends that the e-mail addresses to which people send
>>> messages, and the Web pages they visit, are the functional equivalent of the
>>> phone numbers they call. Officials familiar with the matter, speaking
>>> anonymously because of the sensitivity of the issue, say that most companies
>>> agree with that interpretation and have routinely turned over such records
>>> when requested.
>> 
>> The web pages people visit: "the functional equivalent of the phone numbers
>> they call"?!?
> 
> So if you send a message to an electronic mail list like this one is
> it considered some sort of mutiny   ?
> 
> Regards
> Jorge

ATOM RSS1 RSS2