NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 9 Apr 2014 15:06:42 +0200
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Hi,

The board’s resolution on specification 13 of the new gTLD registry agreement is going to be a discussion topic on tomorrow’s irregularly scheduled GNSO council call. This resolution is specific to .Brand registries, a model that was (as far as I can tell) not taken into consideration back in 2007 when the GNSO WG on Introduction of new gTLDs concluded its work.

The ICANN board has delayed implementation of this resolution for 45 days pending feedback from the GNSO Council on whether the council believes this resolution conflicts with policies developed in the GNSO, or not. Personally, I’m somewhat divided on whether I have substantive difficulties with this resolution or not and am keen to hear others thoughts (from both in and out of NCSG). I am, however concerned from a process perspective. This resolution does strike me as a new policy, and it hasn’t gone through the regular PDP. I would also appreciate thoughts on this aspect of the resolution.

If you want to listen in on tomorrow’s call, you can do so here:

GNSO Council meeting audio cast
http://stream.icann.org:8000/gnso.m3u

The meeting agenda is posted here:

https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Agenda+10th+April+2014

So…, thoughts anyone?

Thanks.

Amr

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Bruce Tonkin <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: [council] new gTLD Program Committee resolution regarding Specification 13 of the new gTLD registry agreement
> Date: March 31, 2014 at 9:01:48 AM GMT+2
> To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
> 
> From:  http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-new-gtld-26mar14-en.htm
> 
> Approval of Registry Agreement Specification 13 for Brand Category of Applicants
> 
> Whereas, on 2 July 2013, the ICANN Board New gTLD Program Committee (NGPC) approved the form of the New gTLD Registry Agreement to be entered into by ICANN and successful New gTLD applicants.
> 
> Whereas, the Brand Registry Group engaged with ICANN regarding modifications to the New gTLD Registry Agreement to address concerns of their constituents.
> 
> Whereas, on 6 December 2013, ICANN posted for public comment a proposed Specification 13 to the New gTLD Registry Agreement http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/base-agreement-spec-13-proposed-06dec13-en.pdf   [PDF, 80 KB] ("Specification 13"), which if adopted would provide limited accommodations to registry operators of TLDs that qualify as ".Brand TLDs."
> 
> Whereas, the proposed Specification 13 was revised in response to the public comments, including the removal of a provision allowing a registry operator of a .BRAND TLD to designate one or more ICANN accredited registrars as the exclusive registrar(s) for the TLD in response to a comment submitted by a group of eleven registrars.   An update to the community and a revised draft was posted on the ICANN Blog on 14 March 2014 (http://blog.icann.org/2014/03/summary-and-analysis-of-specification-13-public-comments/ ). 
> 
> Whereas, on 25 March 2014 the NGPC received notification from the group of registrars that submitted the joint comment referenced above during the public comment period that it no longer objected to the inclusion of a provision allowing a registry operator of a .BRAND TLD to be limited to using no more than two registrars at one time.
> 
> Whereas, the NGPC takes specific note of Policy Recommendation 19 in the GNSO's Final Report on the Introduction of New Generic Top-Level Domains (8 August 2007), which provides that "registries must use only ICANN accredited registrars in registering domain names and may not discriminate among such accredited registrars."
> 
> Whereas, the NGPC has considered all of the comments received from the community, and has determined that the revised Specification 13 provides appropriate and limited accommodations to registry operators of TLDs that qualify as .Brand TLDs.
> 
> Whereas, the NGPC is undertaking this action pursuant to the authority granted to it by the Board on 10 April 2012, to exercise the ICANN Board's authority for any and all issues that may arise relating to the New gTLD Program.
> 
> Resolved (2014.03.26.NG01), the NGPC approves Specification 13 to the New gTLD Registry Agreement attached to this Resolution as Annex 1  (http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-new-gtld-annex-1-26mar14-en.pdf   ) [PDF, 106 KB] (which does not include the clause allowing a .Brand registry operator to designate a limited number preferred registrars for the TLD), and authorizes the President and CEO, or his designee, to take all necessary steps to implement Specification 13 to the New gTLD Registry Agreement consistent with this resolution.
> 
> Resolved (2014.03.26.NG02), the NGPC approves the incorporation of the additional clause identified below into Specification 13. Implementation will not take effect until 45 days from the publication of this resolution to:
> 
> (i) provide the GNSO Council an opportunity to advise ICANN as to whether the GNSO Council believes that this additional provision is inconsistent with the letter and intent of GNSO Policy Recommendation 19 on the Introduction of New Generic Top-Level Domains; 
> 
> or (ii) advise ICANN that the GNSO Council needs additional time for review, including an explanation as to why additional time is required.
> 
> 
> 	"The second sentence of Section 2.9(a) of the Agreement is superseded by the following:
> 
> 	Subject to the requirements of Specification 11, Registry Operator must either (i) provide non-discriminatory access to 	Registry Services to all ICANN accredited registrars that enter into and are in compliance with the registry-registrar 	agreement for the TLD; provided that Registry Operator may establish non-discriminatory criteria for qualification to register 	names in the TLD that are reasonably related to the proper functioning of the TLD, or (ii) designate no more than three 	ICANN accredited registrars at any point in time to serve as the exclusive registrar(s) for the TLD."
> 
> A .BRAND TLD registry operator may amend its Specification 13 to incorporate this provision upon request as part of implementation. The President and CEO, or his designee, is authorized to take all necessary steps to implement this provision in Specification 13 to the New gTLD Registry Agreement consistent with this resolution.



ATOM RSS1 RSS2