Weldone Farz
You may wish to add or reshare the survey link on item 5 after the readout.
Thanks as always

On Wed, 20 Mar 2024, 07:25 farzaneh badii, <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> Here are my rough and brief notes about ICANN 79. I don’t follow all the
> issues, so if others want to expand or add to anything or correct something
> please do chime in:
>
>
>
> NCUC ICANN read out
>
>
> Starting with the board meeting : we have our board meetings at the NCSG
> level.
>
>    1. we talked about Human Rights Impact Assessment and asked the board
>    to consider doing HRIA on its resolutions. They said we should show them
>    how! So we should.
>    2. We talked about having a crisis report and an info page when the
>    status of the transfer and operations of a ccTLD is unknown. The response
>    was a bit bizarre and in way not very clear. But seems like IANA will issue
>    a report about a few cases.
>
> ….
>
>    1. DNS abuse contract amendment and what we want to see (for us,
>    qualitative indicators such as due process and prevention of rights
>    infringement take priority and our success measure is not just how much
>    abuse (which is not really possible to measure) has gone down but how just
>    the abuse mitigation measures have been
>    2. RDRS: rdrs is the triage system that stakeholders use to file
>    requests to have access to domain name registrants personal sensitive data.
>    It’s a voluntary system and there is a standing committee that wants to
>    help with understanding the system better and improve it. We have to
>    closely monitor this group as sometimes some ideas might be raised in the
>    group that could have an impact on people’s privacy, civil liberties etc
>    3. Attended the GAC open mic, raised issues with the confidentiality
>    of law enforcement requests for RDRS, also mentioned RVCs should not
>    violate human rights
>    4. New gTLDs (sub pro) and Registry voluntary commitments : we can’t
>    have ICANN enforce RVCs that regulate content, conduct and services online.
>    It’s against the bylaws. We can’t have RVCs that could impact freedom of
>    expression and other human rights.
>    5. Board seat 14: we have a team to work on improving the processes to
>    appoint the board member (i shared a survey on ncsg list)
>
>
>
> Farzaneh
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> [log in to unmask]
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>