+1 I particularly would like to thank the Chair for the maturity he
exhibited in all these especially considering that his actions was not
against the charter (even though the concern raised by the few members made
sense, it's obvious it would have no impact on the current election).

Regards

Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On 25 Aug 2016 12:49, "Rafik Dammak" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to thank the NCSG executive committee and chair for handling
> this and responding in due time and swiftly, showing at the end a spirit of
> collegiality.
> I also see that we got a healthy debate with participation of many of our
>  members, that people could from procedural standpoint use existing
> provision in the charter on the matter . In addition to that, others are
> already proposing possible solutions for future.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rafik Dammak
>
> 2016-08-25 0:36 GMT+09:00 Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]>:
>
>> Dear NCSG members,
>>
>> The Executive Committee of NCSG has decided that in the GNSO council
>> elections, voters may choose up three options, including candidates
>> and None of the Above. Any candidate getting less None of the Above
>> will be considered not elected.
>>
>> In the NCSG Chair election, if None of the Above option gets more votes
>> than the candidate, the candidate will be considered not elected.
>>
>> Election will proceed uninterrupted. If you have already voted you
>> don't need to do anything, but you can vote again if you think
>> this makes a difference - only the last vote will count.
>>
>> But if you have not yet voted, there's still time!
>>
>> Voting will close on September 2. Make sure you vote before that.
>>
>> --
>> Tapani Tarvainen
>> Chair, Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group
>>
>
>