NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stephanie Perrin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stephanie Perrin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:18:07 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 kB) , text/html (36 kB)
That was my recollection as well.

Stephanie


On 2017-02-21 21:47, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi Ed,
>
> I don't think Mason served in council while being liaison to GAC. his 
> term in GNSO council was from 2011 to 2013, then he served as liaison 
> in 2014 (GAC early engagement pilot project was in FY15-16)
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2017-02-22 3:11 GMT+09:00 Edward Morris <[log in to unmask] 
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>:
>
>     Hi Tapani,
>
>     Mason Coke previously served as GAC liaison while on Council. The
>     rules may have changed though - good idea to check.
>
>     And please don't go to Antarctica looking for a Councillor. As
>     Ayden properly pointed out, I botched that one. Antarctica is not
>     an ICANN region. Although perhaps if it was those resident there
>     might have better internet access :) (
>     https://pilotfiber.com/blog/how-the-internet-reaches-antarctica/
>     <https://pilotfiber.com/blog/how-the-internet-reaches-antarctica/> ).
>
>     Good luck with the selection.
>
>     Best,
>
>     Ed
>
>     Sent from my iPhone
>
>     On 21 Feb 2017, at 17:58, Tapani Tarvainen
>     <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>     wrote:
>
>>     Hi Ed,
>>
>>     Thank you! I was just in the process of collecting exactly
>>     this information, you saved me a ton of work. :-)
>>
>>     One potentially relevant thing you omitted is that Carlos is GNSO's
>>     GAC liaison, which may be incompatible with councillorship. Even
>>     if it
>>     is though it doesn't mean he'd be ineligible from our viewpoint, he'd
>>     just have to resign if appointed. I will check to confirm this.
>>
>>     Thanks again,
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Tapani Tarvainen
>>
>>     On Feb 21 08:34, Edward Morris ([log in to unmask]
>>     <mailto:[log in to unmask]>) wrote:
>>
>>>     Hello everybody,
>>>
>>>     I’ve been pleased to see the spirited discussion on list about
>>>     the process to select someone to represent the NCSG on the GNSO
>>>     Council in light of Amr Elsadr’s recent resignation. I know,
>>>     like and respect all four announced candidates, and would
>>>     encourage anyone else interested in serving on Council to put
>>>     their names into the pool for consideration. As a current
>>>     Councilor I don’t feel it is my role to support or endorse any
>>>     particular candidate so I’m not. Rather, I look forward to
>>>     welcoming to Council the individual selected to serve as a
>>>     temporary / replacement Councilor and pledge to do all I can to
>>>     help him or her adjust to her or his new role.
>>>
>>>     I’ve read lots of unique suggestions and ideas that have been
>>>     promulgated on list for filling the open slot: elections, a
>>>     shared seat, short term appointees who pledge not to run for
>>>     re-election etc. What all of these well meaning ad hoc ideas
>>>     ignore is that we as a community are bound together by a set of
>>>     governing documents that anticipated that vacancies may occur on
>>>     Council and created procedures we may now use to determine both
>>>     who selects the replacement Councilor, the type of replacement,
>>>     and who is eligible to serve as same.  The relevant governing
>>>     documents are:
>>>
>>>     1. The Bylaws For Internet Corporation For Assigned Names and
>>>     Numbers (ICANN Bylaws):
>>>
>>>     https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en/#article11
>>>     <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en/#article11>
>>>
>>>     2. The GNSO Operating Procedures, version 3.2 (GNSO OP):
>>>
>>>     https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-01sep16-en.pdf
>>>     <https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-01sep16-en.pdf>
>>>
>>>     3. The NCSG Charter (NCSG Charter):
>>>
>>>     https://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/ncsg-charter-05may11-en.pdf
>>>     <https://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/ncsg-charter-05may11-en.pdf>
>>>
>>>
>>>     In this post I’d like to go through the relevant sections of
>>>     these documents with you so as we go forward we do so in
>>>     compliance with the documents that constitute the legal essence
>>>     of the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group.
>>>
>>>     HOW WE DETERMINE THE REPLACEMENT COUNCILOR
>>>
>>>     1. ICANN Bylaws
>>>
>>>     The ICANN Bylaws §11.3c states:
>>>
>>>     A vacancy on the GNSO Council shall be deemed to exist in the
>>>     case of the death, resignation, or removal of any member.
>>>     Vacancies shall be filled for the unexpired term by the
>>>     appropriate Nominating Committee or Stakeholder Group that
>>>     selected the member holding the position before the vacancy
>>>     occurred by giving the GNSO Secretariat written notice of its
>>>     selection. Procedures for handling Stakeholder Group-appointed
>>>     GNSO Council member vacancies, resignations, and removals are
>>>     prescribed in the applicable Stakeholder Group Charter.
>>>
>>>     Amr’s resignation has created a vacancy on the GNSO Council. As
>>>     he was appointed by the NCSG, procedures for his replacement are
>>>     contained in the NCSG Charter.
>>>
>>>     NCSG Charter §3.2 reads:
>>>
>>>     In the event that a GNSO Council Representatives is unable to
>>>     finish his or her term, the NCSG-EC will appoint a temporary
>>>     GNSO Council Representative to serve until the next
>>>     regularly-scheduled election as provided in Section 3.8 of the
>>>     GOP. At that time, a new GNSO Council Representative will be
>>>     elected to serve out the balance of the vacated term, if any.
>>>
>>>     The NCSG EC is charged with appointing a temporary GNSO Council
>>>     Representative. As Amr’s term was scheduled to end at the next
>>>     election there will be no balance of the vacated term to fill at
>>>     that time.
>>>
>>>     I should note that myself, Stephanie Perrin and Rafik Dammak are
>>>     in the first year of a two year term as Councilors that extend
>>>     to 2018. Stefania Milan and Marilia Maciel have terms ending
>>>     this year. They both, as well as whomever is selected to fill
>>>     the vacant seat, will be eligible to run for re-election to
>>>     Council. Neither are term limited.
>>>
>>>     TYPES OF REPLACEMENTS
>>>
>>>     The GNSO OP §3.8.3a cites the ICANN Bylaws in referring to
>>>     Council vacancies due to “resignation or other permament
>>>     vacancy”. However, GNSO OP §3.8.3b also states:
>>>
>>>     During any transition period following the occurrence of the
>>>     permanent vacancy, but before a new election or appointment and
>>>     subsequent seating of the replacement Councilor, the remedy in
>>>     Paragraph 3.8.4 is available.
>>>
>>>     GNSO OP §3.8.4a reads:
>>>
>>>     For a Councilor who is not appointed by the Nominating
>>>     Committee, the appointing organization may, at its discretion,
>>>     name a Temporary Alternate to serve in the absent or vacant
>>>     Councilor’s seat.
>>>
>>>     This is exactly what the NCSG-EC did when it appointed Avri
>>>     Doria, an excellent choice, as a Temporary Alternate to serve in
>>>     the Council seat vacated by Amr during the February 16th GNSO
>>>     Council meeting. Matt Shears, Sarah Clayton and Martin Pablo
>>>     Silva Valent have also served our community exceptionally well
>>>      as Temporary Alternate Councilors during the current Council term.
>>>
>>>     It is important to note that Temporary Alternates are NOT full
>>>     Councilors. For example, per GNSO OP §4.7 (ii) :
>>>
>>>     A Temporary Alternate may not be selected to register a proxy vote.
>>>
>>>     The Temporary Alternate position is designed to be a short term
>>>     measure to prevent any Stakeholder Group from being short a
>>>     voice during a planned absence of a Councilor or in response to
>>>     a sudden vacancy. It is not intended to be a long term solution.
>>>     As such, rules applicable to selection of individuals for
>>>     Councilor positions (for example, term limits) appear not to be
>>>     applicable to Temporary Alternates (although one could certainly
>>>     argue the spirit of such rules means they should).
>>>
>>>     So there are two types of substitutes allowed for a vacated seat:
>>>
>>>     1. Temporary Alternate: a short term appointment for a limited
>>>     term with limitations on Councilor powers granted to him or her and,
>>>
>>>     2. Temporary (NCSG Charter) / Replacement (GNSO OP) Councilor:
>>>     appointment of an individual to serve until the next election
>>>     period,  which in this case means the expiration of the term of
>>>     the vacated seat.
>>>
>>>     ELIGIBILITY ISSUES
>>>
>>>     ICANN Bylaws §11.3b contains two provisions of interest:
>>>
>>>          For these purposes, a person selected to fill a vacancy in
>>>     a term shall not be deemed to have served that term,    A former
>>>     Council member who has served two consecutive terms must remain
>>>     out of office for one full term prior to serving any subsequent
>>>     term as Council member.
>>>
>>>     Anyone selected to serve as the Temporary / Replacement
>>>     Councilor will then be eligible to serve an additional two full
>>>     terms. This currently applies, for example, to Marilia Maciel
>>>     who: 1) filled a vacancy and then 2) was elected to serve one
>>>     full term. She is eligible to run for one additional full term.
>>>
>>>     David Cake is the only NCSG member ineligible to serve as a
>>>     Temporary/Replacement Councilor by virtue of having completed
>>>     two consecutive terms within the past two years (two years being
>>>     a full term).
>>>
>>>     CRITERIA
>>>
>>>     ICANN Bylaws §11.3a reads:
>>>
>>>     Stakeholder Groups should, in their charters, ensure their
>>>     representation on the GNSO Council is as diverse as possible and
>>>     practicable, including considerations of geography, GNSO
>>>     Constituency, sector, ability and gender.
>>>
>>>     NCSG Charter §3.1 states:
>>>
>>>     The NCSG is assigned six (6) GNSO Council seats through the
>>>     ICANN Bylaws. All NCSG GNSO Council representatives will be
>>>     directly voted on by the full membership of the NCSG using
>>>     weighted voting as defined in Section 4. To the maximum extent
>>>     possible, no more than two (2) NCSG GNSO Council Representatives
>>>     can be declared resident of the same geographic region as
>>>     defined by ICANN. Reasonable efforts should be taken to recruit
>>>     nominees so that all geographical regions may be represented by
>>>     the NCSG GNSO Council Representatives. Reasonable efforts should
>>>     also be taken to ensure gender balance and in no circumstance
>>>     should there be fewer than 2 members of any gender.
>>>
>>>
>>>     Although it could be argued that NCSG Charter §3.1 applies only
>>>     to those Councilors selected by election rather than
>>>     appointment, read in conjunction with ICANN Bylaws §11.3a it is
>>>     clear that the diversity requirements apply here as well. NCSG
>>>     Charter §3.1 is the Charter component that directly complies
>>>     with ICANN Bylaws §11.3a, a provision that does not  specify
>>>     mode of selection. Poor legal construction in the Charter is no
>>>     reason to ignore the Bylaws requirement and, in fact, if read in
>>>     such a way the NCSG Charter would arguably not be in compliance
>>>     with the ICANN Bylaws.
>>>
>>>     The current composition of the NCSG GNSO Council representation is:
>>>
>>>          3 female, 2 male    2 Europe    1 North America    1 Asia /
>>>     Australia / Pacific    1 Latin America / Carribean
>>>
>>>     The ICANN Bylaws requires the NCSG EC to attempt, in making its
>>>     appointment, to ensure that our representation on the GNSO
>>>     Council is “as diverse as possible and practicable, including
>>>     considerations of geography, GNSO Constituency, sector, ability
>>>     and gender”.
>>>
>>>     In implementing this Bylaws mandate the NCSG Charter created the
>>>     hard requirement that there should be no fewer than two members
>>>     of the same sex in the GNSO Council contingent. As that
>>>     requirement has already been met by the current Council group it
>>>     is inapplicable to the current appointment.
>>>
>>>     “To the maximum extent possible” the NCSG EC needs to ensure in
>>>     making this appointment that no more than two Council
>>>     representatives are residents of the same ICANN defined
>>>     geographic region. As Europe is already at the maximum capacity
>>>     of 2 representatives, “to the maximum extent possible” the
>>>     individual selected for the temporary/replacement role should be
>>>     resident in a different ICANN region. No other region is
>>>     impacted by this section of the Charter.
>>>
>>>     Reasonable efforts must be made by the NCSG EC to ensure:
>>>
>>>          all geographical regions are represented in the GNSO
>>>     Council cohort, and    the GNSO Council group has gender balance.
>>>
>>>     Amr Elsadar resided in the ICANN designated African region. We
>>>     no longer have an African resident on Council. The NCSG EC needs
>>>     to make a reasonable effort to try to replace Amr with a
>>>     resident of either Africa or Antarctica, the two ICANN regions
>>>     for which the NCSG does not have Council representation.
>>>
>>>     Amr’s resignation has also left our Council representation with
>>>     a gender imbalance: three woman, two men. The NCSG EC needs to
>>>     make a reasonable effort to “ensure gender balance” by replacing
>>>     Amr with a male.
>>>
>>>     As I understand things, self nominations are still being
>>>     accepted for this position. I’m sure the NCSG EC would encourage
>>>     anyone interested in applying for the position, most
>>>     particularly males and those residing in either Africa or
>>>     Antarctica.  Making a reasonable effort to meet these diversity
>>>     goals would be helped by the largest possible number of applicants!
>>>
>>>     Please note that the only absolute here is that David Cake can
>>>     not be the Temporary/Replacement Councilor. Sorry Dave. :) All
>>>     other criteria are guidelines of various strengths (“maximum
>>>     extent possible”, “reasonable”) that the NCSG EC is obliged to
>>>     give consideration to but is not required to absolutely adhere
>>>     to. Given the high standards of the NCSG EC I’m sure they will
>>>     try and if, despite best efforts,  their selection does not
>>>     correspond with Bylaws/OP/Charter suggestions I’m quite sure and
>>>     expect they will tell us why. They do not have an easy job.
>>>
>>>     For the record, these are not requirements that I personally
>>>     would prioritize. Please don’t shot the messenger. :) A
>>>     commitment to work, to participate on Council small groups
>>>     (where Amr was excellent): these are my wish list for my future
>>>     colleague. I do, however, believe in the rule of law rather than
>>>     the rule of man and these are the rules we have to work with.
>>>
>>>     I wish the NCSG EC well in their deliberations and look forward
>>>     to welcoming a new Councilor on board as soon as possible. We
>>>     have lots of work to do together. The sooner the better.
>>>
>>>     Kind Regards,
>>>
>>>     Edward Morris
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>



ATOM RSS1 RSS2