NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:43:50 EST
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (600 bytes) , text/html (1394 bytes)
 
Carlos:
Doesn't your proposal reward the BC/IPR by giving them exactly what they  
really want -- no new domain names for a long time, if ever? 
 
Kathy

Sorry to  be "systematic" (in some regions of Brazil, it means "crazy"), 
but I take  advantage of yet another clever manipulation of the issue by 
the BC/IPR  community to insist on NCUC discussing (and hopefully 
approving for  submission to ICANN) my proposal of a temporary freeze on 
any gTLD move  (new/deleg/redeleg) until an independent, qualified 
pluralist working  group (far away from Washington) prepares a detailed 
report with  recommendations.






ATOM RSS1 RSS2