NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Gannon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
James Gannon <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Jul 2015 23:31:58 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2455 bytes) , text/html (10 kB)
And if we consider the 10045 signatories to the savedomainprivacy petition as commenters this brings us to almost 22000 comments, the largest in ICANN history eclipsing the .xxx comments by almost 8000 comments.



-James



From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Rafik Dammak

Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 12:26 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: [Info] Comment on Proxy & Privacy service report



Hi everyone,



We just submitted our comment on PPSAI working group report (http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-ppsai-initial-05may15/msg11285.html) .



Thanks to our members involved in the working group and who had/have to spend hours in confcalls, briefing and drafting to increase awareness about what is going on.



You can find all statements submitted for the report here: http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-ppsai-initial-05may15/threads.html , more than 11000 individual and organisations comments submitted.



For this report, things sounds different this time because it went to mainstream media and more people are aware about this ongoing policy discussion. I am copying here several articles but also online petitions (a non-exhaustive list)):





  *   http://www.wired.com/2015/07/unassuming-web-proposal-make-harassment-easier/

  *   https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/07/powerful-coalition-letter-highlights-danger-icanns-new-domain-registration

  *   https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150623/17321931439/icanns-war-whois-privacy.shtml

  *   https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150707/12264631576/icanns-threat-to-privacy-is-not-theoretical.shtml

  *   https://www.savedomainprivacy.org/

  *   http://onlineabuseprevention.org/letter-to-icann-july-2015/

  *   http://www.circleid.com/posts/20150703_confessions_of_an_ex_opponent_of_whoisprivacy/

  *   http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/06/domain-name-whois-anonymity-hangs-in-the-balance-under-icann-proposal/

  *   https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/06/changes-domain-name-rules-place-user-privacy-jeopardy

  *   http://feministing.com/2015/07/02/icannt-even-new-internet-standards-could-make-doxing-easier-than-ever/

  *   http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/07/07/domain_privacy_furor_continues/



this is a good example to highlight why ICANN policies are important and critical even if they may sound cryptic or narrow.



Best Regards,



Rafik Dammak



NCSG chair



ncsg.is<http://ncsg.is> & @NCSG_ICANN


ATOM RSS1 RSS2