NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:
Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:16:05 -0500
Reply-To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
hi,

I think this is a great idea.

and of course we can be collegial. 
 in fact face to face we almost always are.

Might be too late for SJO as many people's hotel reservations and travel plans are made.  But perhaps the next meeting in Prague or the one after in Toronto would be good targets.

avri


On 13 Dec 2011, at 05:51, William Drake wrote:

> On Dec 12, 2011, at 8:37 PM, Joly MacFie wrote:
> 
>> What are you suggesting? A separate "The Public Interest in ICANN" conference? Seems like an idea. The NCUC one day prior to ICANN 40 was certainly valuable.
> 
> If I thought people could really come prepared to have a collegial, probing, non-histrionic discussion of the relationship and possibilities for cooperating on matters of joint concern, yes, that'd be the sort of thing I'd be proposing.
> 
> Bill

ATOM RSS1 RSS2